How the U.S. Has Destroyed Its Economical Future

A. The Main Reason for U.S. Gains Superpower Standing

For the first 130 years, the U.S. patent system provided a great inventive for inventors. When the Eastern block did not pay attention to economy, the massive number of inventions and innovation culture are the primary reasons for U.S. to gain technological, economical and military supremacy. 

B. Damage the U.S. Economic Backbone

Politicians do not understand that inventing is an rare odds game with very long term risk cycle. Politicians and justices slowly destroy the best in the nation. The American Invents Act was a final thrust to the national backbone. Here is reality for a U.S. inventor:

(1) Invention must be a first....

Patent Death Squads (A Listing of Them)

Moat people has kept making the same wrong argument whether the Patent Office can fix its own mistake. Yes, it can without double if it really makes real administrative mistake. That should take place in the three to ten years prosecution time windows.

However, in most of the cases invalidated by the death Squads, the ground for invalidating patents are not really based upon mistakes. They are invalidated because some ignorant judges created new law as a super legislature over the Congress. Second, most of cases were made by twisting facts in the cases because the death squads are hired, trained, and sworn to kill patents. Thus, the PRAB was administrated for improper purposes.

Thus,....

The Worst Prior Art Citations Found In U.S. Patent Records

Why Is the U.S. Patent System Destined to Fail and Bring Down the Nation?

The U.S. is in a fastest track to end its technological supremacy. All superpowers in human histories failed, but what is really unique is the speed of decline of the U.S. The problem is built in the common law legal system.  All common law nations are in rapid decline. 

I will point out one of the main reasons. A functional patent system must be built on sophisticated balance between present interest and future interest and between those who want to use technologies and those who are able to invent and willing to invent. Those balances must be maintained in light of competition with other nations and the technological landscape of the world.

Under the U.S. legal system, there is no....

One Hundred Things That Are Primarily Responsible for Ruining the U.S.'s Innovation Culture

The People Who Have Done the Most In Destroying U.S. Technological Foundation

This page will maintain the the list of politician and judges that have done the most damages to the U.S. Technological Foundation.

(1) John Marshall Harlan II

Lear, Inc. v. Adkins, 395 U.S. 653 (1969),[1] is a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court overturning the doctrine of licensee estoppel and holding that public interest considerations require that licensees be free to challenge the validity of possibly spurious patents under which they are licensed. This entailed the overruling of Automatic Radio Mfg. Co. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. and prior cases that it had reaffirmed.  This decision makes patent grant like liquid.

Warner-Jenkinson Company, Inc. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.,....

The PTO Uses Imaginary Steps in Conducting Mental Steps Analysis

Most applicants who have prosecuted patent applications in software most probably can tell about their bad experiences. 

Now, I have some stories I must tell. My stories show how the Patent and Trademark Office has created a culture to deny patent for no valid reason. One thing that is very special about the patent office is that examiners can freely characterize anything in any language no matter how absurd and impossible. The so-called skilled person standard is just a myth with no substance.

I personally have dealt with many examiners over the years, I clearly understand how this dooming patent practice model was created. Thus, I want to make sure this article is not intended to....